Children’s Views In Divorce Proceedings

Category Archives: Evidence

Children’s Views In Divorce Proceedings

In litigated custody battles, clients frequently ask if their child can testify before the judge.  However tempting this is, there are many factors to consider before placing your child into the front lines of a bitter divorce battle.

In Hong Kong, family court judges are cautious and historically, children’s views are only accepted through a social welfare report and/or any expert evidence such as a child psychologist.  However, similar to what is being seen in the USA, Hong Kong courts are now recognizing the importance of a child’s view and it is being promoted.

Child Theft

In Hong Kong, as part of its obligations under Article 13 of the United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child, the court will acknowledge that where a child’s interests are affected, a child’s viewpoint can be taken into consideration if that child is capable of forming his/her own views whether it be in person or through a representative. In practice, a child’s viewpoint is taken in the form of the following:

  1. Judicial Interview: Under his/her own discretion, the judge may grant an interview and the mechanism for conducting an interview of a child. This interview is not for the purpose of gathering evidence (which is the responsibility of the social welfare report) but rather it is to enable a judge to listen to the views of a child.
  2. Appointment of Legal Representative for the child: This is similar to what has been seen in California cases where a minor’s counsel is appointed under California Family Code section 3151 which allows the appointment of an attorney to look after a child’s best interests.  Here in Hong Kong, the appointment of a legal representative for a child is pursuant to Rule 72 and 108 of the Matrimonial Causes Rules and the purpose is to reflect a child’s interests and not necessarily a child’s wishes.  A legal representative for a child is not an automatic right and an unlikely appointment if a child’s view is adequately reflected and evidenced in a report before the court.

Whether a judge will allow your child’s views to be heard or not is dependent on a number of factors including: whether a child is suffering from harm due to access disputes; cases which are exceptionally difficult and involve foreign elements such as immigration or removal; an older child is opposing a proposed course of action; where there may be parental alienation from one or both of the parents; cultural and/or religious differences affecting a child; complex medical/mental health issues that need to be determined; serious allegations of physical, and mental or sexual abuse or in circumstances where neither parent seem to be suitable guardians.

Divorce matters affecting Children

Before a consideration is made with respect to allowing your child to testify or express his/her views to a court, you may want to ponder upon the following:

  1. Is Your Child’s Testimony Necessary? Ask yourself tough questions including why you want your child to testify.  What is the real reason?  Can your child truly assist the judge to  understand the circumstances in your home and how the custody arrangement is affecting your child? Generally speaking, there should be a strong reason behind having your child testify against the other parent rather than simply you wanting more custody time and/or harboring resentment/revenge against your ex-spouse.
  2. What Are The Long-Term Effects On Your Child? Consider the long-term effects testifying will have on your child.  A divorce is already a traumatizing experience for most children.  It is even worse if the parents are engaged in a bitter and litigated custody battle.  Consider factors such as whether it will be difficult for your child to testify because it will make him/her feel guilty for picking sides.  You need to consider the psychological effects this will have on your child and how it will affect his/her relationship with your ex-spouse.

Child's feelings in divorce

Remember that it is in your child’s best interests to have a healthy and communicative relationship with your ex-spouse, who is, after all, your child’s other parent.  Allowing your child to testify will undoubtedly affect the relationship dynamic between you and your ex-spouse and your child.  Also, try and determine why your child is expressing an interest in testifying.

In making any decision relating to your child, be sure to focus on what is in your child’s best interests and the right decision will follow.

How To Prepare For Family Court In Hong Kong

After filing for a Divorce in Hong Kong, you will be required to attend the Family Court once the court sets down a hearing, whether it be for a First Appointment (a hearing where the court will be given an update on your case and where a judge give directions to move your case forward) or a more substantive hearing with respect to an application filed by yourself or your ex.

With that in mind, many people ask what they should expect and how to prepare for a Family Court hearing.  Here are some tips ahead of your court hearing:

  • Where Is The Family Court Located? The Family Court is located in the Wanchai Law Courts at Wanchai Tower, 12 Harbour Road.  Prior to attending the court, make sure you know the exact courtroom that you are required to attend and ensure you provide for sufficient time so that you are not late for your hearing.  There is a sitting area available at the courthouse whilst you wait for your hearing to begin.  However, if you need to have discussions with your solicitor prior to the hearing, plan ahead and go early so you can reserve a conference room pending the commencement of your hearing.  The waiting time before your hearing begins could be long so be sure that you have sufficient childcare and/or have informed your employer that you will be away for at least a few hours for your hearing.

  • What Should You Wear? This is a frequently asked question and should not be ignored.  When you attend a hearing, you will be in front of a District Court judge and it is imperative that you appear presentable.  Whilst you are not required to wear a suit and/or tie, it is recommended that you are dressed in smart and respectful attire.

  • How Should You Prepare? If you are represented by a solicitor, it will be best for you to have a discussion with your solicitor prior to the hearing.  Your solicitor can provide you with a rundown as to what to expect and how the hearing will proceed.  Generally speaking, you will not be required to speak directly to the judge if you are represented by a solicitor.  However, there may be occasions when a judge will ask you a question directly in court so you should be ready to speak if necessary.  If you are attending the court for a more substantive hearing and/or trial and are required to provide testimony, be sure to spend a few hours with your solicitor in advance so that you can be prepared to give oral testimony which your solicitor can assist you with.  If there is something you wish the judge to know about your case, speak to your solicitor and ensure that he/she understands what points you want addressed at the hearing (because your solicitor and/or barrister will be the one to present your case to the judge and they will speak on your behalf).  If you are representing yourself, be sure to prepare by jotting down on paper, the key points you wish to get across to the court so that when you do present yourself before the judge, your points are clear and concise.  Focus on getting the facts across to the judge rather than using it as an opportunity to complain to the judge about your ex.

Finally, try not to be nervous.  This is an opportunity for you to be heard at the hearing and if you are represented, trusted that you are in good hands, with a solicitor who is advocating on your behalf.

Cross Border Views on Inherited Wealth

This article looks at how inherited funds are treated from a cross-border perspective. To the surprise of many, inherited wealth in a divorce may be treated differently depending on the jurisdiction in which you file for divorce. Location is therefore an important factor to consider when divorcing. To unpack this topic, let’s explore and contrast how inherited wealth is treated in Hong Kong vs. the United States of America, in particular the community property state California.

1. Inheritance in Divorce in California: California, like many other states, is a community property state. This means that in a divorce, all property acquired during the marriage is divided equally between the divorcing parties. An exception to this rule occurs when an individual receives an inheritance during the course of the marriage. In those circumstances, under California law, an inheritance is separate property and therefore will be excluded from the division of assets and debts in a family estate (Family Code Section 770).

It is important to note that when an individual receives an inheritance, the monies received must be traceable to the source so there is no confusion as to whether the money is separate property or community property. That is why it is always a good idea to open a separate bank account and deposit inheritance monies into this separate account to identify them and keep them separate. Otherwise, by depositing inheritance funds in a joint community bank account, you are commingling funds. When monies become commingled, it can become very difficult to trace monies back to the separate property source and your former spouse may have an argument that all inherited funds were already spent during the marriage and therefore all remaining funds in the joint account are community property and must be split equally. When in doubt, always keep clean records of any inherited funds and keep records of how these monies have been spent. If you don’t keep track, a tracing expert may be enlisted but tracing can become quite expensive and time-consuming thereby stalling the divorce.

2. Gifts Are Separate Property in Divorce in California: Another exception occurs when an individual receives a gift. For example, if you receive a beautiful piece of jewelry from your spouse for an anniversary or birthday, this gift is generally excluded from the division of assets and debts in a family estate. If, however, the gift could be considered of substantial value, the courts will then look at the asset more carefully and it may be subject to division taking into account the parties’ wealth and finances.

If the asset is determined to be of substantial value, it is community property and must be divided between the parties – unless of course, either party can present a written transmutation agreement changing the character of this asset from community to separate.

3. Inherited Wealth in Divorce in Hong Kong: Over the years, there has been much debate over how inherited funds should be treated in a divorce in Hong Kong and whether these funds should be excluded from division. In Hong Kong, inherited wealth are those assets that come from a source wholly external to a marriage. Like Great Britain, the courts in Hong Kong have regard to the “yardstick of equality” as a starting point, meaning the goal is to divide the asset pool fairly. Courts in Hong Kong may however, veer from this principle and make adjustments, thereby dividing assets “unequally” if after reviewing certain statutory factors, taking into account the whole of the asset pool, reasonable needs, compensation and applying the “sharing principle” if assets exceeds the needs, in addition to the specific circumstances surrounding the divorce, and finds that an individual’s inheritance could be a resource to fulfill and satisfy an individual’s reasonable needs and the needs of the children post-divorce (See the Hong Kong landmark case titled DD v LKW (2010) 13 HKCFAR 537.) As a result, the Court may heed to flexibility in order to find a suitable answer to the circumstances of each case whereby the objective is to reach a just result that is fair for both parties. Thus, unlike California, inheritance funds received by an individual in Hong Kong may be taken into account because it forms part of the asset pool that is a financial resource to one or both of the parties. Stephen J. Peaker, head of the Family Law Department at Oldham, Li & Nie (OLN) and a fellow of the International Academy of Family Lawyers (IAFL) says: “The issue of inherited wealth is becoming more and more prevalent in Hong Kong, both in contested and uncontested cases. The economic success of Hong Kong and the natural passage of time combined have created substantial inherited wealth. One of the key areas of dispute on succession is in relation to family businesses, often with enormous value where one party inherits a business interest. This business can be valued as part of an asset pool and unsurprisingly, this is viewed by the creators of the wealth as inherently unreasonable and has led to the proliferation of generational trusts and the increase in prenuptial agreements.”

It is interesting to note that in Hong Kong, the Court may consider an inheritance even if it has not yet been received, but provided an individual is set to receive an inheritance in the near future or has a perceived resource. Additionally, if you’re involved in a short-term marriage and there are inheritance funds in the asset pool, the courts may not consider the inheritance in the asset division yet if it is a long-term marriage, the courts may include inherited funds, unless these funds were kept entirely separate.

It is important to understand and become knowledgeable of the specific laws of your jurisdiction. Speak with a professional about how to protect your inheritance and what can be done to avoid any issues when dividing assets in your divorce. If you’re getting married, you may want to speak with a family law professional to discuss a prenuptial agreement and ways to avoid any issues in the event of a divorce. Being well prepared will help avoid any heartache in the future!

Calling In Experts For A Divorce

Who Are The Experts?

Experts are individuals with education, experience and knowledge in a specialised area. They may be called upon when there is an issue in a divorce that the Court needs specialist input on. The Court will consider the expert’s advice and/or opinion when deciding an issue.

What Types Of Experts Are There?

There are many types of experts in a divorce. Here are some of the most common types:-

  1. Psychologists:  Psychologists are regularly called upon for children matters. They will analyse the situation and interview the parties involved before providing a professional opinion on the effect of divorce on the children to the Court. The psychologist will then recommend a child custody and visitation plan based on their analysis.
  2. Vocational Expert:  Vocational Experts are usually engaged in cases where one of the spouses has not worked for a long time as they might have given up their career to look after the family. There may therefore be a need to assess his or her current and future earning ability for the calculation of child and spousal support. A vocational expert will evaluate a spouse’s education and skills to determine their earning capability.
  3. Forensic Accountants and Financial Experts:  Forensic accountants are experts in discovering a spouse’s hidden assets and/or hidden sources of income. For example, if one spouse own a business, a financial expert could help in assessing and providing the Court with a more accurate value of the business. Such information helps to build an objective financial picture of the spouses’ assets for division and for the calculation of child support and spousal maintenance.
  4. Real Estate and Antique Experts:  Real Estate experts have the knowledge and skills to calculate the true market value of property. In divorce cases where high value assets are involved, antique experts may be retained to value certain items or collections. Again, this provides the Court with a more accurate financial picture of the spouses to consider when deciding on the question of asset division, or the calculation of child support or spousal maintenance.

While experts may be beneficial to your case, it is important to note that they may be costly and you may have to bear the costs by yourself. You should therefore discuss the need for an expert with your lawyer to see whether the benefits of hiring an expert outweigh the costs of the service that they provide.