Category Archives: Expenses

Spotlight Profile: Kyra Cornwall, Barrister, 1 Hare Court

In this Spotlight Profile, we are talking to Kyra Cornwall, Barrister at 1 Hare Court in London, England. Kyra specializes in high profile matrimonial matters and has extensive experience working on family law matters involving international jurisdictions including Cayman Islands, Singapore, France, Russia and Hong Kong.

Kyra, it is such a pleasure to speak with you today as I know you run a very busy practice in London, England as Barrister to many high-profile matrimonial clients. Kyra, this is your first spotlight profile here on Hong Kong Divorce, can you tell our readers more about yourself and the work that you do in the matrimonial arena in London?

Thank you so much for inviting me. It’s a pleasure to be involved!

I am a Barrister practising at 1 Hare Court, the leading matrimonial finance set in England and Wales. We are based in the heart of legal London, in the middle of the Temple, and specialise in matrimonial finance cases. In my ten years at the Bar, I have developed a practice involving lots of international families, both representing them directly in England and Wales, and offering English advice where proceedings are taking place abroad.

Your practice extends to international jurisdictions. Can you tell us the link that you have to matrimonial matters here in Hong Kong and your experience working on Hong Kong cases?

In 2017, I was awarded the Pegasus Scholarship by the Inns of Court which enabled me to spend that summer in Hong Kong working firstly at Withers then at Temple Chambers (with Richard Todd QC) and finally sitting in on cases at the Family Court with Her Honour Judge Melloy. The purpose of the scholarship is to enable lawyers to build their international awareness and forge links abroad. I had a particular interest in Hong Kong as my father’s family are from Hong Kong originally, and so had been looking for a way to develop international links on a professional basis as well as personally. That summer certainly gave me the ability to do both of those things.

Over the course of my stay, I was fortunate to meet a huge number of family law practitioners and was given a real insight into a legal system that is so similar to that in which I practise in the UK. Since returning to the UK, I have maintained a Hong Kong focus to my work from London, continuing to advise on cases which include connections to Hong Kong.

Have you noticed any changes or differences in your practice as a result of Covid-19 and the ongoing pandemic?

Absolutely. When the pandemic hit in London, many practitioners were still working from hard copy papers and almost all court hearings were in person. Suddenly the courts were closed and the legal world had to take a giant leap into the 21^st century. Within a matter of weeks, papers were being sent electronically and court hearings were taking place via video platform. Although there were some teething problems at the outset, in my view this has been transformative for life as a lawyer and at the Bar particularly.

Prior to the pandemic, a significant portion of my life was spent travelling to Court, waiting around at Court and travelling home again. Being able to operate remotely has virtually removed this, enabling people to work more efficiently and improving work life balance for practitioners.

Beyond this, for those cases involving parties based internationally or where a party has to travel a lot for work, the advent of video platform hearings has also made it much easier for them to be involved without disrupting their working lives so much.

That’s not to say that there have not been problems: there have been technical glitches along the way and there are difficulties when a party does not have more than one screen available to them, but for the most part I think that the pandemic has forced the legal profession to take positive steps that I hope will remain in place moving forward.

One of your areas of specialty is marital agreements. Hong Kong follows the United Kingdom landmark decision as seen in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42. Do you see the law evolving or changing in the future with respect to marital agreements in the UK?

Since the landmark decision in Radmacher, the courts have had to grapple with the questions of whether the parties had all the information material to their decision(s) to enter into a marital agreement, whether each party intended that the agreement should govern the financial consequences of the marriage ending and whether in all the circumstances this is fair.

Whilst the 2010 decision was followed by the Law Commission report in 2014 which suggested that marital agreements should in essence be upgraded to “Qualifying Nuptial Agreements” – i.e. enforceable contracts – in an attempt to provide more certainty to parties, this has not been made into law.

The current approach in the English courts is to focus on the circumstances in which agreements were reached and where they leave the parties in real terms financially, based on all the circumstances of the case. The recent reported decisions demonstrate a reluctance for the court to uphold agreements which are unfair or which do not meet needs objectively (see for example Brack v Brack [2018] EWCA Civ 2862, Ipekci v McConnell [2019] EWFC 19, IU v OS [2020] EWFC 98). The existence of an agreement does not automatically drive a case into needs territory only; it is one of the factors that weighs in the balance. Equally, a lack of legal advice does not automatically render an agreement unfair (see for example Versteegh v Versteegh [2018] EWCA Civ 1050).

That said, anecdotally I would say that a marital agreement that, for example, excludes sharing or fixes provision, does often have the impact of reducing a party’s claim where otherwise they might achieve more.

In Hong Kong, we see many expatriate couples with questions on whether to file in Hong Kong versus their home countries. What advice would you give to those individuals who have a connection to both Hong Kong and England & Wales in terms of jurisdiction in regards to their divorce?

If I were to meet with a new client who had the option of getting divorced in both Hong Kong and England & Wales, I would suggest that they take local advice in both jurisdictions before making a decision. Where the outcome is likely to be similar (as between Hong Kong and England & Wales), it is likely to come down to questions of practicality.

There is one change coming in England & Wales however that may benefit one or both parties. No fault divorce is due to be brought in from April 2022 (i.e. being able to get divorced without having to plead any allegations of blame). This will hopefully help to drive down tensions and therefore reduce some of the distress that divorce proceedings can bring.

There’s sometimes an ongoing belief that England is a better forum to divorce because of the higher potential in terms of ancillary relief (finances) and costs. Is this true or is this simply a misconception?

Both England & Wales and Hong Kong adopt bespoke outcomes on divorce, applying the concept of sharing, and the homemaker is seen to contribute just as much as the breadwinner. On that basis, assets in both jurisdictions are divided on a sharing basis if needs are met. Yes, the numbers are big, but England & Wales and Hong Kong are broadly similar in their approach to outcome.

To that extent, whilst London has the reputation of being generous on divorce, I think that is more due to the system that we apply (i.e. very similar to that of Hong Kong) as compared to the rest of the world. Broadly the same principles apply between England & Wales and Hong Kong when dividing assets and awarding maintenance, but other factors will play into needs-driven outcomes, such as the cost of living, parties’ abilities to work (e.g. visa issues), and access to the courts (Hong Kong grants jurisdiction where parties have a “substantial connection” at the date of petition/application, England & Wales operates a more stringent test).

This was such an interesting chat Kyra, thank you so much for your time. We look forward to having you on board again to discuss other interesting and key topics in the area of matrimonial law!

About Kyra:

Kyra is a barrister at 1 Hare Court in London, England. Kyra specializes in financial remedies, claims after foreign divorce, nuptial agreements and jurisdiction disputes. She is a member of the Family Law Barrister Association (FLBA) and the Inner Temple.

Kyra is described as a “a star in the marking, super clever, slick, elegant and professional” and “a smiling assassin” by both clients and peers.

Kyra’s practice is concentrated on high profile and international matrimonial cases, specifically issues dealing with forum disputes, cases with international trust and company structures, cases with complex issues of enforcement, issues of privilege and cases involving the enforcement of nuptial agreements. She regularly represents husbands and wives in high value and prominent matters, both led and alone in the High Court. She advises clients nationally and internationally, from jurisdictions including the Cayman Islands, Singapore and France, and has a particular interest in cases with links to Hong Kong, having undertaken the Pegasus Scholarship there in 2017.

Kyra is a contributing author of Rayden and Jackson on Divorce and Matrimonial Matters, a comprehensive and key guide for family law practitioners

For more information about Kyra and her practice, you can visit her Chambers’ website: https://www.1hc.com/people/kyra-cornwall/

Misconduct In Divorce

In what will be considered one of the most stressful times in an individual’s life, it is no surprise that many people behave badly during a divorce. It is a stressful life event, that many reckon to be on par with the death of a family member. With that being said, it is important that if you are going through a divorce, your conduct throughout the proceedings is important and it could have an impact on your divorce. To behave poorly is a reflection not only on your character but also affects the actual outcome of your divorce.

In a divorce, your conduct in the course of proceedings can be taken into account by the judge, although generally speaking misconduct during the proceedings is more properly dealt with in an adverse application for costs against you.

What are some examples of “bad behaviour” and misconduct in a divorce? Wanton dissipation/reckless dissipation of assets is one form of misconduct. In KMD v PIB [2011] HKFLR 351, the husband was excessively spending on his lifestyle as well as his hobby of flying helicopters and this was taken into account by the court, resulting in HK$1.2 million being “added back” from his 50% shares into the matrimonial pot for division. In MKKWH v RKSH [2013] HKFLR 540, the husband maintained three (3) other families over a period of years and post-separation the wife sought to add back an equivalent sum of monies that her husband had spent on his other families. In this case, the Court of Appeal refused the wife’s application to add back these funds on the basis that the funds had been received post-separation. In A v B [2017] 1 HKLRD 187, the court held that payments to a girlfriend of HK$1.2 million was “wanton” and “reckless” and “extravagant” in view of the marital assets and the standard of living, and the court therefore added back into the matrimonial pot, the non-marital spending.

Material non-disclosure is another form of misconduct in litigation such as monies being hidden. In SANK v PGN [2011] HKFLR 390, the court considered whether a husband’s non-disclosure and refusal to mediate should result in a costs award to the wife. The court concluded that “[t]here are many reasons which may affect the court in considering costs, such as culpability in the conduct of the litigation; for instance material non-disclosure of documents.” Parties to a divorce have a duty of full and frank disclosure and by failing to disclose, the courts will take this misconduct into consideration.

Another form of misconduct is a refusal to attempt to settle. In LWF v LMF [2015] HKFC 146, the wife’s failure to respond and attempt to negotiate was a relevant factor for the husband being awarded costs. The same misconduct label is also attached to litigants who refuse to provide evidence and/or participate in proceedings such as filing necessary paperwork and/or attending court hearings. By refusing to participate, the court will have no choice but to see the case as one-sided and only make decisions based on the actual evidence in front of the court.

The courts in Hong Kong have a duty to have regard to the conduct of the parties to a marriage. Negative marital conduct can be detailed in sworn affidavits filed with the court and will be considered by the court as a material factor in allowing the court to depart from equality (See LKW v DD). However, it is to be noted that if there is a departure from equality, the courts will look for “obvious and gross” misconduct for it to be taken into account.

Cross Border Views on Inherited Wealth

This article looks at how inherited funds are treated from a cross-border perspective. To the surprise of many, inherited wealth in a divorce may be treated differently depending on the jurisdiction in which you file for divorce. Location is therefore an important factor to consider when divorcing. To unpack this topic, let’s explore and contrast how inherited wealth is treated in Hong Kong vs. the United States of America, in particular the community property state California.

1. Inheritance in Divorce in California: California, like many other states, is a community property state. This means that in a divorce, all property acquired during the marriage is divided equally between the divorcing parties. An exception to this rule occurs when an individual receives an inheritance during the course of the marriage. In those circumstances, under California law, an inheritance is separate property and therefore will be excluded from the division of assets and debts in a family estate (Family Code Section 770).

It is important to note that when an individual receives an inheritance, the monies received must be traceable to the source so there is no confusion as to whether the money is separate property or community property. That is why it is always a good idea to open a separate bank account and deposit inheritance monies into this separate account to identify them and keep them separate. Otherwise, by depositing inheritance funds in a joint community bank account, you are commingling funds. When monies become commingled, it can become very difficult to trace monies back to the separate property source and your former spouse may have an argument that all inherited funds were already spent during the marriage and therefore all remaining funds in the joint account are community property and must be split equally. When in doubt, always keep clean records of any inherited funds and keep records of how these monies have been spent. If you don’t keep track, a tracing expert may be enlisted but tracing can become quite expensive and time-consuming thereby stalling the divorce.

2. Gifts Are Separate Property in Divorce in California: Another exception occurs when an individual receives a gift. For example, if you receive a beautiful piece of jewelry from your spouse for an anniversary or birthday, this gift is generally excluded from the division of assets and debts in a family estate. If, however, the gift could be considered of substantial value, the courts will then look at the asset more carefully and it may be subject to division taking into account the parties’ wealth and finances.

If the asset is determined to be of substantial value, it is community property and must be divided between the parties – unless of course, either party can present a written transmutation agreement changing the character of this asset from community to separate.

3. Inherited Wealth in Divorce in Hong Kong: Over the years, there has been much debate over how inherited funds should be treated in a divorce in Hong Kong and whether these funds should be excluded from division. In Hong Kong, inherited wealth are those assets that come from a source wholly external to a marriage. Like Great Britain, the courts in Hong Kong have regard to the “yardstick of equality” as a starting point, meaning the goal is to divide the asset pool fairly. Courts in Hong Kong may however, veer from this principle and make adjustments, thereby dividing assets “unequally” if after reviewing certain statutory factors, taking into account the whole of the asset pool, reasonable needs, compensation and applying the “sharing principle” if assets exceeds the needs, in addition to the specific circumstances surrounding the divorce, and finds that an individual’s inheritance could be a resource to fulfill and satisfy an individual’s reasonable needs and the needs of the children post-divorce (See the Hong Kong landmark case titled DD v LKW (2010) 13 HKCFAR 537.) As a result, the Court may heed to flexibility in order to find a suitable answer to the circumstances of each case whereby the objective is to reach a just result that is fair for both parties. Thus, unlike California, inheritance funds received by an individual in Hong Kong may be taken into account because it forms part of the asset pool that is a financial resource to one or both of the parties. Stephen J. Peaker, head of the Family Law Department at Oldham, Li & Nie (OLN) and a fellow of the International Academy of Family Lawyers (IAFL) says: “The issue of inherited wealth is becoming more and more prevalent in Hong Kong, both in contested and uncontested cases. The economic success of Hong Kong and the natural passage of time combined have created substantial inherited wealth. One of the key areas of dispute on succession is in relation to family businesses, often with enormous value where one party inherits a business interest. This business can be valued as part of an asset pool and unsurprisingly, this is viewed by the creators of the wealth as inherently unreasonable and has led to the proliferation of generational trusts and the increase in prenuptial agreements.”

It is interesting to note that in Hong Kong, the Court may consider an inheritance even if it has not yet been received, but provided an individual is set to receive an inheritance in the near future or has a perceived resource. Additionally, if you’re involved in a short-term marriage and there are inheritance funds in the asset pool, the courts may not consider the inheritance in the asset division yet if it is a long-term marriage, the courts may include inherited funds, unless these funds were kept entirely separate.

It is important to understand and become knowledgeable of the specific laws of your jurisdiction. Speak with a professional about how to protect your inheritance and what can be done to avoid any issues when dividing assets in your divorce. If you’re getting married, you may want to speak with a family law professional to discuss a prenuptial agreement and ways to avoid any issues in the event of a divorce. Being well prepared will help avoid any heartache in the future!

Calling In Experts For A Divorce

Who Are The Experts?

Experts are individuals with education, experience and knowledge in a specialised area. They may be called upon when there is an issue in a divorce that the Court needs specialist input on. The Court will consider the expert’s advice and/or opinion when deciding an issue.

What Types Of Experts Are There?

There are many types of experts in a divorce. Here are some of the most common types:-

Psychologists: Psychologists are regularly called upon for children matters. They will analyse the situation and interview the parties involved before providing a professional opinion on the effect of divorce on the children to the Court. The psychologist will then recommend a child custody and visitation plan based on their analysis.
Vocational Expert: Vocational Experts are usually engaged in cases where one of the spouses has not worked for a long time as they might have given up their career to look after the family. There may therefore be a need to assess his or her current and future earning ability for the calculation of child and spousal support. A vocational expert will evaluate a spouse’s education and skills to determine their earning capability.
Forensic Accountants and Financial Experts: Forensic accountants are experts in discovering a spouse’s hidden assets and/or hidden sources of income. For example, if one spouse own a business, a financial expert could help in assessing and providing the Court with a more accurate value of the business. Such information helps to build an objective financial picture of the spouses’ assets for division and for the calculation of child support and spousal maintenance.
Real Estate and Antique Experts: Real Estate experts have the knowledge and skills to calculate the true market value of property. In divorce cases where high value assets are involved, antique experts may be retained to value certain items or collections. Again, this provides the Court with a more accurate financial picture of the spouses to consider when deciding on the question of asset division, or the calculation of child support or spousal maintenance.

While experts may be beneficial to your case, it is important to note that they may be costly and you may have to bear the costs by yourself. You should therefore discuss the need for an expert with your lawyer to see whether the benefits of hiring an expert outweigh the costs of the service that they provide.

Financial Savviness In Divorce

It is no surprise that one of the main issues that can cause tension between divorcing couples is money. It is for this very reason that it is extremely important for both parties to be aware of their financial picture during the divorce process. Many times, a husband or wife may wish to bury their head in the sand, refusing to deal with the details of the matrimonial asset pool. This alone can place the individual at a great disadvantage.

Ideally, it is important to be financially aware of the matrimonial finances during the marriage and to be informed of all assets and debts that make up the matrimonial estate. However, it is common for couples to divvy up responsibilities leaving one party responsible for the collective finances of the home. This places one spouse at a disadvantage and when the couple decide to divorce it becomes difficult when all finances must be disclosed and division is necessary. Not to worry however, it is never too late to educate yourself on your finances to assist you during the divorce process.

When you divorce in Hong Kong, one of the first things you must fill out is a Form E. This is a very detailed form where you and your spouse must each disclose all assets at their current value as well as liabilities and ongoing/future expenses. This allows the parties and the Family Court to gain a more in-depth view of the matrimonial pot. Gaining an overview of the matrimonial pot will be exceptionally more difficult if your spouse is not forthcoming about the finances and you are not well-versed in what you and your spouse have in terms of assets and debts.

It is for this very reason that it is important to be financially savvy during the divorce process. Here are a few things to keep in mind so that you are in a better financial position both during and after your divorce:

Organize, Organize and Organize More: Everyone is talking about organization guru Marie Kondo. Well, it’s time to Marie Kondo your finances and organize all your financial documents so that you know what assets and liabilities you have. To save trees, you can organize financial documents in folders on your computer and keep them in a confidential file that only you have access to. By saving and keeping all key financial documentation on hand, it will be extremely helpful to you and to your solicitor when it comes time to exchange all financial information with your spouse and his/her solicitor. By being organized, the process of providing financial discovery will not be as daunting or overwhelming. I repeat, it is not helpful to dump a suitcase full of unorganized documents at your solicitor’s office. This will only increase your costs owed to your solicitor at the end of the day if they have to sift through everything for you.
Knowledge is Power: When you are organized, you will have a better understanding of what accounts you have and how much money is owed. In divorce, your financial picture changes drastically and you will need to come to terms with a new normal when it comes to your finances. No longer are you partnered with someone who may be contributing to your monthly income. Thus, if you are educated about your personal finances, you are in a better position to determine a budget for you and your family going forward and create a feasible financial plan post-divorce.
Keep Your Finances Separate Post-Separation: Once you separate, it may be a good idea to open up your own bank/credit card accounts to keep your finances separate and keep track of what you have and/are spending post-separation. This will also help when the matrimonial pot is being divided and you can easily keep track of expenses if this becomes an issue when discussing spousal maintenance and children’s expenses.

In addition to the assistance your solicitor will be providing you, it might also be helpful for you to consider hiring a professional financial planner. A financial planner can help you organize your finances and assist you in the budget process to create a foundation for a healthy financial picture going forward.

Spotlight Profile: Kyra Cornwall, Barrister, 1 Hare Court

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter